Paradigm

Matt Corrow
Winter Park High School

I prioritize clear impacts and argumentation
If I don’t understand an argument, I can’t vote on it.
Moderate speed is fine, but if you spread excessively without clarity, I will miss arguments.
I will not fill in logical gaps — if you don’t explain it, I won’t assume it
Explain your evidence — don’t just read it.
Quality > quantity.
Clarity > speed.
I prefer arguments that feel persuasive to a reasonable person.
Be respectful and professional at all times.
What I Don’t Prefer
Spreading without clarity.
Rudeness or dismissive behavior.
I prefer:
● Clear value/criterion or framework (if used)
● Logical reasoning
● Real-world examples
● Clear impact explanation
I do NOT prefer:
● Spreading
● Excessive theory
● Tricky, technical arguments without clear abus